Discriminative control of saccade latencies

The spatial scale of attention strongly modulates saccade latencies.

We have previously shown that when a stimulus consisting of two concentric rings moves, saccade latencies are much longer (by 150 ms) when attention is directed to the larger ring than to the smaller ring. Here, we investigated whether this effect can be explained by a deferral of the "cost" of making a saccade while the target remains inside the attentional field, or by purely visual factors (...

The influence of spatial frequency and contrast on saccade latencies

We characterised the impact of spatial frequency and contrast on saccade latencies to single Gabor patches. Saccade latencies decreased as a function of contrast, and increased with spatial frequency. The observed latency variations are qualitatively similar to those observed for manual reaction times. For single target detection, our findings highlight the similarity in the visual processes th...

The remote distractor effect of saccade latencies in fixation-offset and overlap conditions

Saccadic responses to a visual target are delayed if another visual stimulus (distractor) is presented in the visual field opposite to the target (remote distractor effect). In the present study, two experiments were conducted to investigate how the remote distractor effect is modulated by the presence or absence of a central fixation stimulus. In both experiments, when a fixation stimulus was ...

Action effects in saccade control.

According to the ideomotor principle, action preparation involves the activation of associations between actions and their effects. However, there is only sparse research on the role of action effects in saccade control. Here, participants responded to lateralized auditory stimuli with spatially compatible saccades toward peripheral targets (e.g., a rhombus in the left hemifield and a square in...

Learning Strategies for Saccade Control